Companies Support Dearborn Developer Fakhoury

Dearborn resident Hakim Fakhoury, requesting a one-year preferred developer extension that his Dearborn Village Partners (DVP) corporation has with the city of Dearborn, has support from two key businesses interested in being part of his multi-million dollar project.

An early rendering of the proposed DVP project on Michigan between Military and Howard.

Fakhoury shared copies of letters with Deepsaidwhat.com that he has from Emagine,who wants to build a movie theatre in west Dearborn, and Moravian Companies, who is interested in bringing apartment living for as many as 600 students into downtown west Dearborn.

In the letters, both addressed to Dearborn Mayor John B. O’Reilly, Jr. and the City Council, the two companies urge city leaders to grant the one-year extension to Fakhoury as a preferred developer for the property along Michigan Avenue between Howard and Military.

City Council will vote on whether to extend the agreement tonight.

“Emagine Entertainment, Inc. continues to have a real and genuine interest in participating in the project,”writes Paul A. Glantz, the founder and chairman of Emagine. “That being noted, undertaking such a project, particularly in this capital market environment, is extraordinarily complex. Accordingly, governmental cooperation in a public-private partnership will be essential to a successful outcome for this property.

“The approved brownfield plan Mr. Hakim Fakhoury has secured is a tremendous asset to the project and it forms the foundation upon which other incentives and tax-based financing mechanisms will need to be layered to help bring this project to fruition.

“In my opinion, no group is better positioned to make this important project more successful than Mr. Fakhoury. Our continued interest in pursuing this project is predicated on Mr. Fakhoury’s involvement as the manager of Dearborn Village Partners and his continued cooperation as the owner of the properties along Michigan Avenue that are a vitally important component of any successful redevelopment of this parcel.”

The letter from Moravian Companies is equally supportive.

“Our team, that includes Campus Village Communities, an experienced and successful Michigan-based student housing development and management company, has been and continues working with Dearborn Village Partners on a project to bring apartment style living, for as many as 600 students, to Downtown West Dearborn,” writes Jeffrey P. Helminski, managing partner for Moravian. “The project will be a partnership involving our team, Dearborn Village Partners, U of M-Dearborn and Henry Ford Community College. This is a tremendously complex project also involving the City of Dearborn, a hotel developer, a movie theater company and Mr. Hakim Fakhoury as the owner of a significant number of properties forming the project’s marketing window along Michigan Avenue.

“ . . . Governmental cooperation in a public-private partnership will be essential to a successful outcome for this or any project on this property. The existing approvals already in place from the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, which were secured in partnership with the City of Dearborn, are essential to move this project forward. My understanding is that these tax credits and reimbursement opportunities are available only to Dearborn Village Partners at that location. While changes may be possible, they would seem very unlikely given the fiscal condition of the State.

“We were attracted to this particular project because of the vision and planning of Mr. Fakhoury and Dearborn Village Partners. He controls properties vital to the success of this project and his involvement as the manager of Dearborn Village Partners is important to our continuing interest. We believe this project could be a beneficial enterprise for us and the City of Dearborn in this very difficult economy.

The prospect of increasing the customer base in this vital district will greatly benefit all of the surrounding businesses and the City of Dearborn.”

Emagine, Moravian Companies and Fakhoury, at the request of O’Reilly, were scheduled to attend the Dec. 14 City Council meeting where all residents could hear first-hand about the project, but for reasons not quite clear Council President Tom Tafelski turned that idea off and requested a special study session the following day. With such short notice, Fakhoury says neither Emagine nor Moravian officials were able to attend. The study session was not videotaped for residents to view either.

As Dearborn Councilman Robert Abraham said earlier on these pages, the one-year preferred developer extension for Fakhoury’s DVP needs to be approved. Developers aren’t knocking down the door to do work in Dearborn and the Burton-Katzman mess known as the West Village Commons is perhaps a lesson why it isn’t always safe to work with developers who have no vested interest in our city.

Fakhoury is a Dearborn resident who happens to own a large portion of vacant buildings along Michigan Avenue. He definitely has a vested interest in making sure this project is a success. While some people may dislike the design of his two relatively new buildings, one at Michigan and Military and the other at Michigan and Howard, they are far better than the eyesores that were there before.

Let’s hope, as one reader of Deepsaidwhat.com said in a recent comment here, that our elected city leaders put “their egos in the closet and do this (approve the one-year preferred developer extension) for the citizens of Dearborn” and help these developers “attract new business to Dearborn.”

DeepSaidWhat.com welcomes your views and encourages lively -- but civil -- discussions. Comments are unedited, but submissions reported as abusive may be removed.

  • Donna Hay

    I certainly hope that Fakhoury can bring this about – what a boom for the city this would be. Guess only time will tell.

  • kevin pal

    And where are the students supposed to find the means to live in brand new, highrise apartments? And supporting the shops and restaurants in the area – how will the students have disposable income left to drop with these merchants? Development? Fine. Thinking students are going to be the stepping stone to something greater for West Dearborn? I don’t think this has been completely thought out at this point.

  • YoungGibraltar

    Bobby was right…. ?!?! How did he only place 5 outta 7…

  • becki kain

    i hope the movie theatre really is built. I have friends that come over from Detroit to see movies at Fairlane with me and an Emagine would be a welcome change!

  • Alia

    Kevin pal, do your research. Teens and college age students contribute large dollar amounts to the economy. Have you ever noticed how much marketing is done to get at this age group? Dearborn would be smart to get these college students to spend their money here.

    By 2011, Teen Market Shrinks, Spending Clout Soars to $200B…
    By 2011, Teen Market Shrinks, Spending Clout Soars to $200B
    The market for products bought by and for the 25.6-million-member teen market will undergo a slight growth spurt, increasing from $189.7 billion in 2006 to $208.7 billion in 2011, despite an estimated 3 percent decline in the 12-17-year-old population in that same period, according to “The Teens Market in the U.S.” report from Packaged Facts. According to the teens report (via MarketingCharts):

    •Teen spending money, accumulated through jobs, allowances, “as needed” money from parents, and gifts, will increase an estimated 3.5 percent annually, raising the aggregate teen income 14.4 percent, from $79.7 billion in 2006 to $91.1 billion in 2011.
    •Packaged Facts estimates that 12-14-year-olds have an average annual income of $2,167; teens in the 15-17-year-old age group generate an average annual income of $4,023.
    •The amount of money families spend on teens for food, apparel, personal-care items, and entertainment is expected to grow approximately 7 percent, from $110 billion in 2006 to $117.6 billion in 2011.
    •More than half (51.6 percent) of the teens surveyed said the Internet has changed the way they spend their free time.
    A few more findings from the study are available at MarketingCharts

  • JBatha

    The way the process works is that these students will get jobs at the restaurants, theater, small shops, etc., and in turn the will use their earnings to eat at the resaurants, go to the movies, and shop at the stores. This process will of course take time but just look how Ann Arbor works. Students just don’t go to school, and thats it… The students in this area also try to work too. I think the concept is good. Hopefully this can work and I would love to see that new intermodal train station get off the ground.

  • Paul Mastrogiacomo

    Didn’t he have Caliente and now Fatburger as done deals? How are those coming along? How’s the piano bar? Why hasn’t he torn down the buildings he said he would tear down 2 years ago using his tax credit? The credit union did. Why do his buildings continue to rot?

    Yes, it seems he’s willing to invest in west Dearborn but then it seems he can’t run his investments. How can we expect him to keep Emagine and this housing company considering how his properties have been run in the past?

    I’m also not so sure where he expects 600 students to come from. Anyone living in it would still be driving to campus. The choice will be either to continue living at home and drive to school or paying what will most likely be overpriced rent and still driving to school. The only place I can see student housing really working is right around Brady, which is already nearly a mile away from the closest campus class building. What Mr. Fakhoury wants to build is another 2/3 of a mile farther away.

    And then there’s the building itself. I know it’s an early rendering and from the original project but still it looks like a circus threw up. His current buildings look garish enough. If the new buildings look anything remotely like the rendering it will make the current ones look tame.

  • Jim Sherlock

    Based on everything I’ve read, this project and development agreement should be approved.

  • dearbornGuy

    Kevin, where are your great ideas? And if you have some ideas, what would be your realistic and feasible way to execute?

    I mean God forbid we bring in a bunch of college students, right? maybe trailer park would more suite your liking? From my experiences in college and business, college students spend more than the average person on food, clothes, and entertainment. And they have to work at local businesses to pay for their spending. I think it’s you that hasn’t been completely thought out at this point.

    And the argument is whether to extend the contract, nothing is in stone but the writing is on the wall. I say, if any other developer is ready to move forward with development of this kind then please step up to the plate. If not, move forward with the extension.

  • cloe

    Impressive – I assume that Merchants, the businesses in the 222 shops and the bank have also seen the plans and have agreed to close their doors.

    Also, I think that the majority of students that go to UM Dearborn and Henry Ford Community college do so because they live at home. It is a lot different from Ann Arbor where students come from all around the state, the country, and even the world and need housing. Has the rental cost been mentioned if it is built?

    I’m sure that the majority of the Counsel will vote with Fakhoury. A year from now, we’ll see if the area looks any different that it does today. Only time will tell.

  • cloe

    Just an afterthought. Why wasn’t this brought up at a regular, televised Council meeting. Will the meeting tonight be recorded?

  • 48124

    college students spend $$$$$….the idea of having legit student housing would be to create an environment for students to recognize that UM/D is a viable option at a much cheaper rate per credit hour than ann arbor…in the end, the degree still says UM…and im the farest thing from being a UM “honk”

    This also would bring retail, due to the increase in disposable income as well as more part time jobs that seem to be disappearing from our landscape…..property value in and around this area could possiblity see a spike in growth (what a concept for MI!)…do it do it do it!!!!!!

  • cloe

    48124 – the reason that there isn’t more retail is the rental prices in the area charged by Fakhoury and the other landlords. He is creating building and charging prices that no one can afford.

    Let’s not be like the people in the “Emporer’s New Clothes”. Naked is naked.

  • kevin pal

    Alia – viable statistics, but am interested WHERE (what part of the US) the numbers come from. My experiences in East Lansing and Ann Arbor tell me a large percentage of students live in substandard housing (two to a room, six to a small house) because that’s what they can afford after tuition, books and a few dollars for food.

    DearbornGuy – I see you around here quick to condemn in posts, and as you are quick to chastise me on this point, I have to ask – where are your ideas?

    I am not opposed to the college kids spending money on entertainment and food nor am I foolish enough to not know they’re the ones dropping their money in bars. My problem is that, simply, I just don’t see a highrise development touted as ‘student’ living as being viable in Dearborn. What percentage of college-aged students, attending U-M Dearborn or HFCC are out on their own? My guess is a good percentage still are at home with mom and dad, and therein is the root of the students’ ability to have disposable income. Put those same students in a new, more-than-likely expensive apartment setting and suddenly they’re not spending money on movies and burgers. And then what? Empty storefronts, like the ones we already have in place.

    I await your rebuttal just chuck-full of ‘splendid’ ideas…

  • Paul Mastrogiacomo

    Kevin pal, your ideas of how college students are living are somewhat outdated. In seven years I have not seen anyone living two to a room, except in the dorms. I’m not saying it doesn’t happen but it’s definitely not the norm. And students certainly do have a lot of money to spend after tuition and books and rent.

    With that said, that’s UofM… UM-D is a different thing all together and I agree with you that there is probably little demand for student housing here. UM-D draws on the local level for people living at home and driving to a campus that is completely isolated from the city around it. The choice will be to live at home and drive to school or pay high rent to live in an apartment 1 2/3 miles from campus and still drive to school.

  • DearbornGuy

    I’m in support of this idea. Isn’t that an idea? I’m not one of those guys who is constantly opposed to development in Dearborn. My challenge was to YOU, if you are so opposed to this then what is your alternative “better” idea? You answered with absolutely nothing. The students at UM-D are mostly living at home. BECAUSE THERE AREN’T APARTMENTS GEARED TOWARDS STUDENTS LOCALLY AVAILABLE. Get it?? Many students would love to have that ‘living on their own’ experience without the tuition of Ann Arbor. So many people are so damn quick to be against every idea and business that steps foot in Dearborn. It’s that negative, stubborn state of mind that will keep Dearborn at a stand-still. I’m quick to condemn the posts that are always so negative. It’s fine to be against a development idea, but wouldn’t an alternative answer/idea serve a better purpose rather than “no, no , no, no”. It sounds like whining little children that are spoiled. Spoiled by the way things USED to be or stuck in the past. We need housing, we need retail, we need entertainment, we need bars, we need restaurants, we need development. It’s just sickening to me when people are so against the new development ideas.
    It’s those who are opposed that should be answering with their ‘splendid’ ideas ….. ????

  • abandonmiave

    Sometimes even the best or “splendid” idea’s, dont always play out too well. I’d rather do almost nothing than create an even larger problem…which seams to be the trend around Dearborn. As far as the student housing, I think that would be a great idea; until people start complaining nonstop about major student problems like violence, theft, and partying. Hasn’t anyone been to Kalamazoo recently? I’d rather some people not have the option to come to our city and destroy it. I’m a 20 year old male and trust me, not too many people in the historic homes district will be happy at all. Doesn’t anyone already know about the HUGE ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE problems dearborn has to offer adolescents/college students/adults. This will only attract more and more problems for the west dearborn bars, restaurants, and homes.I think most young adults who will move into these student housing complexes(if they can even afford) will MOST LIKELY already be Dearborn or nearby city residents who are just trying to leave home and have their own place to party, yet still have there parents close by to pay for their needs. I’m sure there are lots of students who want an education and wouldnt abuse student housing…but the ones who do, will make it serious enough of a problem for everyone else. As for complaining nobody supplies good ideas, well thats because most of them require resources that Dearborn doesn’t attract or recieve like other cities, We also focus entirely too much on MICHIGAN AVE. Its a crappy couple miles of road that people aren’t really attracted to…the only reason people go there is because its what they are used to and accept it. We need to think of the whole city of Dearborn and its problems from boundary to boundary and not just one over-congested, bumpy, road which supplies fuel for drunks,addicts, and evil. Lets focus on more important issues than the places to party in Dearborn, like education, parks, jobs. Developement can be a good idea, but only if its exacuted correctly

  • dearbornGuy

    show me a successful, thriving city and I’ll show you an abundance of restaurants, entertainment, and bars. It’s matter of fact, not just an assumption. honestly, who/what do parks attract? The local restaurants/bars provide WAY MORE jobs than parks could ever provide. Be a realist.

  • J_Batha

    But also that successful , thriving city has great mass transit. look at cities like new york, portland, toronto,etc. You need to move people.