Ex-Dearborn Building Inspector Gets 45 Days in Jail
A former supervisor in the Dearborn Building and Safety Department, who in April pleaded guilty to two counts of fraud and resigned from his city job, has been sentenced to 45 days in jail, two years of probation and $1,400 in court costs and fines.

Andrew Pizzino
Andrew Pizzino, as the Dearborn Times Herald points out, is the highest-ranking city employee yet to face jail time for “on-the-job corruption.” You can read the entire Times Herald article by clicking HERE.
Robert Deberardino, another former department supervisor, who is charged with aiding and abetting Pizzino, has yet to be sentenced. The Times Herald reports that attorneys for Deberardino are “appealing a district court decision that denied a motion to have the city’s legal department removed from the prosecution on technical grounds that city attorneys can’t prosecute fellow city employees.”
As for Pizzino, Chief Judge Mark Somers of the 19th District Court levied the maximum permitted on the penalties, except for the jail time, which could have been extended to 90 days.
Prior to his sentencing by Somers, the Times Herald reports that Pizzino apologized for his actions. Pizzino told the court he could have avoided this matter had he gone before the city’s Board of Ethics board before going through with the purchases.
“I have gone to the Ethics Board several times (on property purchases) in the past,” Pizzino is quoted in the Times Herald. “I think this time I just got lazy.”
Judge Somers apparently was skeptical of Pizzino’s remorse.
“What about the victims?” Somers is quoted in the Times Herald. “The clear intent of this scheme was to profit financially by way of fraud.”
Somers rightly pointed out to Pizzino in court that his actions were a serious violation of public trust and that his actions will raise a skeptical eye with any contractor or homeowner who deals with city building authorities in Dearborn.
As far as restitution goes, that is still unresolved and Somers is expected to hold a hearing to determine a figure when Pizzino concludes his jail sentence. Pizzino’s charges stem from two Dearborn houses he purchased under fraudulent circumstances and resold for a combined profit of $156,000, the Times Herald reports.
Times Herald writer J. Patrick Pepper rightly asks in his article “how or why city building inspectors passed inspections on the properties when Pizzino put them on the market when there were such readily apparent problems.”
